KPI-Linked Investment Mechanism for Textile Firms in Uzbekistan: 2023–2025 Evidence

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55640/jme-06-04-13

Keywords:

Investment mechanism, investment attractiveness, textile industry, KPIs

Abstract

This paper develops a KPI-linked investment mechanism aimed at improving the investment attractiveness of textile enterprises and motivates policy and managerial priorities using official sector-level evidence from Uzbekistan for 2023–2025. The empirical motivation is a conversion gap: fixed capital investments expanded rapidly, while textile export value declined over two consecutive years despite a shift toward finished products. Using National Statistics Committee press releases, we document that textile exports in 2024 amounted to USD 2,867.4 million (10.6% of total exports) and decreased by 6.7% compared to 2023; in 2025 they reached USD 2,632.5 million (7.8%) and decreased by 8.2% compared to 2024. Over 2021–2025, total fixed capital investments increased from 236.6 to 591.1 trillion soums, and in 2025 manufacturing absorbed 160.5 trillion soums (27.2% of total). We propose a five-block mechanism—financial, fiscal, institutional, infrastructure, and managerial—mapped to transmission channels affecting the cost of capital, risk profile, productivity, energy and resource efficiency, quality losses, and cash-flow predictability. A composite KPI architecture and an index-building procedure are provided to support enterprise ranking and monitoring of mechanism effectiveness. The results imply that prioritizing energy- and resource-efficiency upgrades, quality-loss reduction, and bankable project preparation, while strengthening one-stop services and infrastructure reliability, can improve investment attractiveness by reducing operational risk and increasing forecastable returns. The paper contributes a replicable IMRaD-aligned framework for aligning policy tools with measurable enterprise outcomes in an energy- and export-sensitive sector.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

National Statistics Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Foreign trade turnover of the Republic of Uzbekistan (January–December 2024). Press release (PDF). https://stat.uz/img/press_reliz_tashi_savdo_eng_yanvar-dekabr_2024_p18901.pdf

National Statistics Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Foreign trade turnover of the Republic of Uzbekistan (January–December 2025). Press release (PDF).

National Statistics Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Fixed Capital Investments in the Republic of Uzbekistan (January–December 2025). Press release (PDF).

Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. LRU-940 (07.08.2024): About saving energy, its rational use and improving energy efficiency. LexUZ.

JICA. JICA supported adoption of the Law “On Energy Saving, Its Rational Use and Improvement of Energy Efficiency of Uzbekistan” (press release, 17.09.2024).

Energy Charter Secretariat. In-Depth Review of the Energy Efficiency Policy of the Republic of Uzbekistan. 2022.

World Bank. Global Investment Competitiveness Report 2019/2020: Rebuilding Investor Confidence in Times of Uncertainty. 2020.

OECD. Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. OECD Publishing, 2008.

UNIDO. Industrial Development Report 2024: Turning Challenges into Sustainable Solutions. The New Era of Industrial Policy. 2024.

Damodaran, A. Applied Corporate Finance. 4th ed. Wiley, 2015.

Saaty, T.L. Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 2008, 1(1), 83–98.

Jolliffe, I.T., Cadima, J. Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 2016, 374:20150202.

Porter, M.E. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press, 1985.

International Energy Agency. Energy Efficiency 2024. 2024.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-29

How to Cite

Mushtari Dadaboyeva. (2026). KPI-Linked Investment Mechanism for Textile Firms in Uzbekistan: 2023–2025 Evidence. Journal of Management and Economics, 6(04), 78–84. https://doi.org/10.55640/jme-06-04-13