Psychological Capital As A Foundational Mechanism For Employee Well-Being, Engagement, And Organizational Justice: An Integrative Positive Organizational Behavior Perspective

Authors

  • Dr. Alejandro M. Torres University of Barcelona, Spain

Keywords:

Psychological Capital, Positive Organizational Behavior, Employee Engagement

Abstract

The contemporary organizational landscape is increasingly characterized by volatility, complexity, and heightened performance pressures, conditions that have intensified scholarly and practical interest in the psychological resources that enable employees and organizations to function effectively and sustainably. Within this context, Positive Organizational Behavior has emerged as a theoretically grounded and empirically supported framework that emphasizes the study and application of measurable, developable, and performance-related positive psychological capacities. Central to this framework is the construct of Psychological Capital, which integrates hope, efficacy, resilience, and optimism into a higher-order resource that transcends traditional forms of capital such as human and social capital. Drawing exclusively on foundational and advanced scholarship within Positive Organizational Behavior, organizational justice, employee engagement, burnout, and high-performance work systems, this article develops a comprehensive and integrative analysis of Psychological Capital as a core mechanism linking organizational practices and climates to employee well-being, engagement, and attitudinal outcomes. The article synthesizes theoretical arguments and empirical findings to examine how Psychological Capital operates both as a direct predictor of desirable work outcomes and as a mediating and moderating variable shaping the impact of justice perceptions, work systems, and emotional experiences. A detailed methodological framework is articulated to demonstrate how such relationships can be empirically examined using established measurement approaches and rigorous analytical strategies. The descriptive results section consolidates consistent patterns reported across prior studies, highlighting robust associations between Psychological Capital and performance, satisfaction, engagement, morale, and reduced burnout. The discussion extends these findings by critically evaluating theoretical implications, addressing conceptual boundaries and limitations, and proposing future research directions that advance Positive Organizational Behavior scholarship. The article concludes by reaffirming Psychological Capital’s strategic relevance for sustainable organizational effectiveness and employee flourishing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Luthans, F. (2002). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 695–706. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.165

Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. (2004). Human, social, and now positive psychological capital management: Investing in people for competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 33(2), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2004.01.003

Luthans, F., Avey, J., & Wernsing, T. (2008). Can positive employees help positive organization change? Impact of psychological capital and emotions on relevant attitudes and behaviors. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44(1), 48–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886307311470

Luthans, F., Avey, J., Avolio, B., Norman, S., & Combs, G. (2006). Psychological capital development: Toward a micro-intervention. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(3), 387–393. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.373

Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 541–572.

Luthans, F., & Youssef-Morgan, C. (2017). Psychological capital: An evidence-based positive approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 339–366.

Majumdar, A., & Kumar, S. (2022). Organizational justice and employee well-being in India: Through a psychological lens. Business Perspectives and Research, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/22785337221077396

Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397–422. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397

Masterson, S., Byrne, Z. S., & Mao, H. (2005). Interpersonal and informational justice: Identifying the differential antecedents of interactional justice behaviors. In What motivates fairness in organizations (pp. 79–103).

May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 11–37. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317904322915892

Miao, R., Bozionelos, N., Zhou, W., & Newman, A. (2021). High-performance work systems and key employee attitudes: The roles of psychological capital and an interactional justice climate. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(2), 443–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2019.1710722

Motyka, B. (2018). Employee engagement and performance: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Management and Economics, 54(3), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.2478/ijme-2018-0018

Paek, S., Schuckert, M., Kim, T., & Lee, G. (2015). Why is hospitality employees’ psychological capital important? The effects of psychological capital on work engagement and employee morale. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 50, 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.07.001

Downloads

Published

2026-02-01

How to Cite

Dr. Alejandro M. Torres. (2026). Psychological Capital As A Foundational Mechanism For Employee Well-Being, Engagement, And Organizational Justice: An Integrative Positive Organizational Behavior Perspective. Journal of Management and Economics, 6(02), 1–5. Retrieved from https://www.eipublication.com/index.php/jme/article/view/3939