The Relationship Between the Methodological Foundations of The Praxeological Approach in Pedagogy and The Concept of Instructional-Methodological Competence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/eijp-05-08-13Keywords:
Praxeology, praxeological approach, instructional-methodological competenceAbstract
This article explores how the methodological foundations of the praxeological approach—conceived as the study of efficient, purposeful, and improvable human action—provide a coherent basis for shaping and assessing instructional-methodological competence in teacher education. Building on classic praxeological principles such as goal-orientation, economy of means, verification through feedback, and iterative improvement, the paper conceptualizes instructional-methodological competence as a composite capacity that integrates curricular reasoning, pedagogical content knowledge, assessment literacy, resource design, classroom enactment, reflective analysis, and evidence-informed redesign. Methodologically, the study follows a theory-building design that synthesizes foundational texts in praxeology with established pedagogical theories, including experiential learning, reflective practice, knowledge-in-action, design-based problem solving, and TPACK. The paper concludes that praxeology not only offers a vocabulary for efficiency and improvement but also anchors instructional-methodological competence in a falsifiable, evidence-seeking, and ethically responsible model of professional action.
References
Kotarbiński T. Traktat o dobrej robocie. — Wrocław: Ossolineum, 1955.
Schön D. A. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. — New York: Basic Books, 1983.
Kolb D. A. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. — Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1984.
Shulman L. S. Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching // Educational Researcher. — 1986. — Vol. 15, No. 2. — P. 4–14.
Mishra P., Koehler M. J. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge // Teachers College Record. — 2006. — Vol. 108, No. 6. — P. 1017–1054.
Deming W. E. Out of the Crisis. — Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1986.
Biggs J., Tang C. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. — 4th ed. — Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2011.
Argyris C., Schön D. A. Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness. — San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1974.
Hattie J. Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. — London: Routledge, 2009.
Black P., Wiliam D. Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards Through Classroom Assessment // Phi Delta Kappan. — 1998. — Vol. 80, No. 2. — P. 139–148.
Brookhart S. M. How to Create and Use Rubrics for Formative Assessment and Grading. — Alexandria, VA: ASCD, 2013.
OECD. The Future of Education and Skills 2030: OECD Learning Compass 2030. — Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019.
Stenhouse L. An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development. — London: Heinemann, 1975.
Trilling B., Fadel C. 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. — San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2009.
Wiggins G., McTighe J. Understanding by Design. — Expanded 2nd ed. — Alexandria, VA: ASCD, 2005.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rashidova Zulayho

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Individual articles are published Open Access under the Creative Commons Licence: CC-BY 4.0.