Presupposition in English And Uzbek: A Comparative Analysis and Its Implications for Forensic Linguistic Expertise
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/eijps-06-03-25Keywords:
Presupposition, comparative pragmatics, forensic linguisticsAbstract
Presupposition constitutes one of the fundamental mechanisms through which speakers encode information that is assumed to be accepted rather than explicitly asserted. Although extensively investigated within pragmatics and discourse analysis, its comparative realization in English and Uzbek remains insufficiently explored, particularly from the perspective of forensic linguistic expertise. This study examines the structural, semantic, and pragmatic characteristics of presupposition in English and Uzbek conflict discourse and evaluates its evidential significance in forensic linguistic analysis. The research employs a qualitative comparative methodology integrating semantic analysis, pragmatic interpretation, discourse analysis, and contextual reconstruction. English and Uzbek linguistic data are analysed to identify factive, lexical, structural, existential, non-factive, and counterfactual presuppositions and to determine their communicative functions within conflict-oriented texts. The findings reveal that although both languages share universal pragmatic principles, they employ different grammatical and discourse strategies for encoding presupposed information. English primarily utilizes syntactic structures, auxiliary constructions, and lexical triggers, whereas Uzbek frequently relies on agglutinative morphology, discourse particles, and culturally conditioned communicative conventions. The study proposes an integrated comparative framework for identifying presupposition in forensic linguistic expertise and demonstrates how objective linguistic evidence may assist in distinguishing implicit factual assumptions from explicit assertions without exceeding the methodological boundaries of linguistic expertise. The proposed framework contributes to comparative pragmatics, forensic linguistics, discourse analysis, and cross-linguistic studies by providing a systematic model applicable to multilingual forensic investigations.
Downloads
References
Austin JL. How to Do Things with Words. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1975.
Baranov AN. Lingvisticheskaya ekspertiza teksta: teoriya i praktika. Moscow: Flinta; Nauka; 2007.
Beaver DI. Presupposition and Assertion in Dynamic Semantics: A Critical Review of Linguistic Theories of Presupposition and a Dynamic Alternative. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications; 2001.
Beaver D, Geurts B. Presupposition. In: Maienborn C, Heusinger K, Portner P, editors. Semantics – Interfaces. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton; 2019. p. 494–528.
Coulthard M, Johnson A. An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence. London: Routledge; 2007.
Coulthard M, Johnson A, editors. The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics. London: Routledge; 2010.
Fillmore CJ. Types of lexical information. In: Steinberg DD, Jakobovits LA, editors. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1971.
Frege G. On Sense and Reference. In: Geach P, Black M, editors. Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege. Oxford: Blackwell; 1952.
Galyashina EI. Osnovy sudebnogo rechevedeniya. Moscow: STENSI; 2003.
Gazdar G. Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition and Logical Form. New York: Academic Press; 1979.
Geurts B. Presupposition and Pronouns. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1999.
Gibbons J. Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Justice System. Oxford: Blackwell; 2003.
Grice HP. Logic and Conversation. In: Cole P, Morgan JL, editors. Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3. New York: Academic Press; 1975. p. 41–58.
Heim I. On the Projection Problem for Presuppositions. In: Proceedings of WCCFL. 1983.
Horn LR. A Natural History of Negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1989.
Karttunen L. Presuppositions of Compound Sentences. Linguistic Inquiry. 1973;4(2):169–193.
Karttunen L. Presupposition and Linguistic Context. Theoretical Linguistics. 1974;1:181–194.
Kiparsky P, Kiparsky C. Fact. In: Bierwisch M, Heidolph KE, editors. Progress in Linguistics. The Hague: Mouton; 1970.
Lakoff G. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1987.
Levinson SC. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1983.
Lewis D. Scorekeeping in a Language Game. Journal of Philosophical Logic. 1979;8:339–359.
Mahmudov N. Til va muloqot. Toshkent: Fan; 2010.
Nurmonov A. Zamonaviy tilshunoslik nazariyasi. Toshkent: Fan; 2012.
Olsson J. Forensic Linguistics. 2nd ed. London: Continuum; 2008.
Safarov Sh. Pragmalingvistika. Toshkent: Oʻzbekiston milliy ensiklopediyasi; 2008.
Searle JR. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1969.
Shuy RW. Language Crimes: The Use and Abuse of Language Evidence in the Courtroom. Oxford: Blackwell; 1993.
Shuy RW. Linguistics in the Courtroom: A Practical Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
Sperber D, Wilson D. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 1995.
Stalnaker RC. Presuppositions. Journal of Philosophical Logic. 1973;2:447–457.
Stalnaker RC. Pragmatic Presuppositions. In: Munitz MK, Unger PK, editors. Semantics and Philosophy. New York: New York University Press; 1974. p. 197–213.
Stalnaker RC. Context and Content: Essays on Intentionality in Speech and Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999.
Strawson PF. On Referring. Mind. 1950;59:320–344.
Strawson PF. Introduction to Logical Theory. London: Methuen; 1952.
Tiersma PM. Legal Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1999.
van Dijk TA. Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
Wilson D. Presupposition and Non-Truth-Conditional Semantics. London: Academic Press; 1975.
Yule G. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996.
Beaver D, Denlinger K. Negation and Presupposition. In: The Oxford Handbook of Negation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2020.
Jeretic P, Warstadt A, Bhooshan S, Williams A. Are Natural Language Inference Models IMPPRESsive? Learning Implicature and Presupposition. arXiv. 2020.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kurbanov Elbek Elmurodovich

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Individual articles are published Open Access under the Creative Commons Licence: CC-BY 4.0.