Lexical and Phraseological Means of Conceptual Expression in The Uzbek Language

Authors

  • Almamatova Shahnoza Associate professor at the Department of Methods of Teaching the Uzbek Language at Jizzakh State Pedagogical University, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55640/eijps-06-03-09

Keywords:

Concept, conceptual expression, lexical means

Abstract

This article examines the role of lexical and phraseological means in the expression of concepts in the Uzbek language. In contemporary linguistics, the concept is understood as a complex cognitive and cultural unit that reflects the interaction of language, thought, and national worldview. The relevance of the study is determined by the growing interest in cognitive linguistics, linguoculturology, and the semantic mechanisms through which language verbalizes culturally significant knowledge. The purpose of the article is to identify the specific functions of lexical and phraseological units in representing concepts in Uzbek and to determine their semantic, expressive, and cultural potential. The research is based on descriptive, semantic, comparative, contextual, and linguocultural methods. The analysis demonstrates that lexical units serve as primary nominative means of conceptual expression, while phraseological units deepen, intensify, evaluate, and culturally specify conceptual content. In Uzbek, concepts such as “ko‘ngil,” “or,” “vatan,” “mehnat,” “mehr,” and “sabr” are represented not only through direct lexical nomination but also through stable figurative expressions that reveal national mentality and value orientations. The findings show that conceptual expression in Uzbek is characterized by the interaction of denotative and connotative meanings, the unity of nominative and evaluative functions, and the important role of phraseological imagery in preserving collective cultural memory. The article concludes that the study of lexical and phraseological means of conceptual expression contributes to a deeper understanding of the Uzbek linguistic worldview and opens new prospects for research in semantics, phraseology, lexicography, cognitive linguistics, and language teaching methodology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Раҳматуллаев Ш. Ўзбек тилининг изоҳли фразеологик луғати. – Тошкент: Ўқитувчи, 1978. – 405 б.

Раҳматуллаев Ш. Ҳозирги адабий ўзбек тили. – Тошкент: Университет, 2006. – 476 б.

Ҳожиев А. Ўзбек тили лексикологияси ва лексикографияси. – Тошкент: Фан, 1981. – 316 б.

Миртожиев М. Ўзбек тили семасиологияси. – Тошкент: Фан, 2010. – 288 б.

Неъматов Ҳ., Бозоров О. Тил ва нутқ. – Тошкент: Ўқитувчи, 1993. – 128 б.

Маматов А. Э. Ўзбек тили фразеологизмларининг шаклланиши масалалари. – Тошкент: Фан, 1999. – 216 б.

Йўлдошев Б. Бадиий матннинг лингвопоэтик тадқиқи. – Тошкент: Фан, 2008. – 160 б.

Сафаров Ш. Когнитив тилшунослик. – Жиззах: Sangzor, 2006. – 316 б.

Маслова В. А. Лингвокультурология. – 4-е изд. – М.: Академия, 2010. – 208 с.

Кубрякова Е. С. Язык и знание: На пути получения знаний о языке: Части речи с когнитивной точки зрения. Роль языка в познании мира. – М.: Языки славянской культуры, 2004. – 560 с.

Телия В. Н. Русская фразеология. Семантический, прагматический и лингвокультурологический аспекты. – М.: Школа «Языки русской культуры», 1996. – 288 с.

Степанов Ю. С. Константы: Словарь русской культуры. – 3-е изд. – М.: Академический проект, 2004. – 992 с.

Аскольдов С. А. Концепт и слово // Русская словесность. От теории словесности к структуре текста: антология. – М.: Academia, 1997. – С. 267–279.

Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By. – Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003. – 276 p.

Wierzbicka A. Understanding Cultures through Their Key Words. – New York: Oxford University Press, 1997. – 317 p.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-15

How to Cite

Almamatova Shahnoza. (2026). Lexical and Phraseological Means of Conceptual Expression in The Uzbek Language. European International Journal of Philological Sciences, 6(03), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.55640/eijps-06-03-09