Harmony As A Dynamic Principle Of Literary Language Organization

Authors

  • Genjebaev Timur Makhsetbaevich Assistant of the Department of Russian Language and Literature, Faculty of Foreign Languages, Karakalpak State University named after Berdakh, Uzbekistan https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1132-1167

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55640/eijps-06-01-17

Keywords:

Literary language, harmony, narrative discourse, stylistics

Abstract

The article describes harmony as a dynamic principle of literary language organization, conceptualizing it not as a static aesthetic ideal but as an evolving structural and semantic process within literary discourse. Drawing on linguistic, stylistic, and metapoetic methodologies, the research examines how harmony emerges through the interaction of narrative voice, lexical choice, syntactic structure, and semantic layering. Special attention is paid to the role of dialogism, intertextuality, and cultural context in shaping harmonious literary expression. The study demonstrates that literary harmony is achieved through the productive tension between unity and diversity, stability and transformation, tradition and innovation. Rather than eliminating contradictions, harmony integrates them into a coherent artistic system. This dynamic model allows literary language to remain flexible, adaptive, and capable of reflecting complex human experience. By analyzing representative examples from Russian narrative prose, the research reveals how linguistic harmony functions as a key organizing principle that ensures aesthetic integrity, communicative effectiveness, and philosophical depth.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Брузгене Р. О динамизме формы: музыкальность литературного текста //Вестник Пермского университета. Российская и зарубежная филология. – 2009. – №. 5. – С. 79-85.

Штайн К. Э., Петренко Д. И. Гармония и симметрия. – ЗАО" Книга", 2015.

Бобровский В. Функциональные основы музыкальной формы. Мocквa: Музыка, 1978. C.331.

Erpf H. Form und Struktur in der Musik. Mainz: Schott, 1967. S.221.

Jung C.G. Psichoanalizė ir filosofija. Rinktinė. (Psychoanalyse and Philosophie. Sammlung). Vilnius: Pradai. 1999. C.438.

Сарсенбаева З. Analysis of images and symbols in english non-realistic works //Ренессанс в парадигме новаций образования и технологий в XXI веке. – 2023. – Т. 1. – №. 1. – С. 229-232.

Qizi S. Z. J. The development of intercultural competence as an essential element in learning EFL //Национальная ассоциация ученых. – 2021. – №. 64-1. – С. 21-24.

Сарсенбаева З. Модернизм в узбекской литературе и интерпретация образов //Зарубежная лингвистика и лингводидактика. – 2024. – Т. 2. – №. 1. – С. 193-199.

Sarsenbaeva Z., Sarsenbaeva R. English Language Proficiency In Translation //Interpretation and researches.-2024.

Zoya S. LITERARY ANALYSIS OF DAVID MITCHELL’S WORKS IN ENGLISH LITERATURE //Talqin va tadqiqotlar ilmiy-uslubiy jurnali. – 2024. – Т. 2. – №. 41. – С. 11-19.

Zoya S. LITERARY ANALYSIS OF ULUGBEK HAMDAMOV’S WORKS IN UZBEK LITERATURE //Talqin va tadqiqotlar ilmiy-uslubiy jurnali. – 2024. – Т. 2. – №. 41. – С. 20-25.

Гиршман М. М. Гармония-абсолютна, а дисгармония-относительна //сост. ЭМ Свенцицкая.–Киев: Издательский дом Дмитрия Бураго. – 2016.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-28

How to Cite

Genjebaev Timur Makhsetbaevich. (2026). Harmony As A Dynamic Principle Of Literary Language Organization. European International Journal of Philological Sciences, 6(01), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.55640/eijps-06-01-17