Articles
| Open Access |
https://doi.org/10.55640/eijps-05-07-06
Linguopragmatics In Modern Linguistics: Unpacking Implicature And Context in Communication
Abstract
The main purpose of this article is conveying and giving valuable information about mostly researched part, field of modern linguistics. It is obvious that, contemporary researches done by various linguists is mainly directed to reveal new perspectives, features of pragmalinguistics. Numerous scientists did a lot of researches in this field of linguistics, and their analyzing methods, results can be used in our scientific works too. In this article, looking through linguopragmatics in Uzbek modern linguistics, opens new ways, new opportunities to young scholars and encourage to investigate new ideas, new approaches in this very field.
Keywords
Linguistics, languages, linguistic tools
References
Levinson S.C. Pragmatics-Cambridge: Cambridge University press,2008
Qinghuan Deng. Key notions for Pragmatics:Fuel and Energy Abstracts 43(9):2474–2476,2011
Verschueren J, Ostman Jan-Ola, Handbook of Pragmatics, 21st annual installment: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2001
Verschueren J. Understanding Pragmatics.(Understanding language series.) London:Arnold; New York: Oxford University Press/
Yule G. Pragmatics. Oxford-Oxford University Press,1996
Việt Anh Ngô, Yule G.Pragmatics, https://www.academia.edu/60254109/Yule_George_Pragmatics
Allott, Nicholas & Wilson, Deirdre.Chomsky and Pragmatics. In Nicholas Allott, TerjeLohndal& Georges Rey, A Companion to Chomsky. Wiley. 2021,pp. 433–447.
Khakimov M. Fundamentals of pragmalinguistics –Toshkent. Akademnashr 2013-176b
Safarov.Sh, Pragmalingvistika-Toshkent.2015
Xusanboevna, S. A. Linguopragmatic Properties of Language. International Journal of Discoveries and Innovations in Applied Sciences, 1(4), 10-12. 2021
AznaurovaE.S.The pragmatics of the artistic word.-Tashkent:Subject,1988.-p28
Austin, J. L. How to Do Things with Words. Clarendon Press. 1962
Nordquist, Richard. (2024, June 7). What Is The Speech Act Theory: Definition and Examples.Retrievedfromhttps://www.thoughtco.com/speech-act-theory-1691986
Hanna, N., & Richards, D. (2019). Speech Act Theory as an evaluation tool for human–agent communication. Algorithms, 12(4), 1-17. Article 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/a12040079
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversityPress.
Alikhasanova Z.F. Linguopragmatics in the system of linguistic sciences,2025
Potts Ch. Conventional implicatures, a distinguished meaning, Oxford university press, 2005
Decressac A. Conventional vs Conversational Implicature: What’s the Difference? 2024 https://medium.com/@adecressac/whats-left-unsaid-conventional-vs-conversational-implicature-bc2eaa11b6ef, 23.03.2025
Davis, Wayne, "Implicature", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2024 Edition), Edward N. Zalta& Uri Nodelman (eds.), URL<https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2024/entries/implicature/>.
Abbott, Barbara, 2006, “Where Have Some of the Presuppositions Gone?”, in Birner& Ward 2006: 1–20.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (pp. 41-58). NewYork: AcademicPress.
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dilrabo Nazirqulova Zafariddin qizi, Abduvahobova Mahina Ozodxonovna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Individual articles are published Open Access under the Creative Commons Licence: CC-BY 4.0.