Towards a Unified Conceptual Framework for Achieving Supply Chain Agility: Integrating Partner Selection, Enablers, and Strategic Partnership in Lean‑Agile Landscapes
Keywords:
supply chain agility, agile supply chain, lean‑agile, supplier selection, strategic partnershipAbstract
Background: In an increasingly volatile business environment characterized by demand fluctuations, unpredictable markets, and rapid product life‑cycle changes, supply chain agility has emerged as a critical strategic imperative. Prior research has explored supplier/partner selection, agility enablers, process control, lean‑agile hybrids, and the impacts of technological or strategic enablers. However, these streams often remain fragmented, lacking a unified conceptual framework that bridges partner selection, enabler interactions, process control, and strategic partnership under lean‑agile paradigms.
Purpose: This paper aims to synthesize the extant literature on agile supply chain to propose a comprehensive conceptual framework that integrates (1) criteria for supplier/partner selection, (2) structural and operational enablers of agility, (3) process control mechanisms, and (4) strategic supply chain partnership dynamics — thereby offering a holistic view of how organizations can achieve agility in lean‑agile or hybrid supply chain contexts.
Methodology: Adopting a theory‑building paradigm, the study performs an intensive literature synthesis of seminal and contemporary works on agile supply chain from multiple disciplines, including manufacturing, logistics, and digital transformation. Patterns, themes, and conceptual linkages are identified, mapped, and integrated into a unified model.
Findings: The resulting framework reveals that effective agile supply chain implementation depends on the sequential and iterative interplay between partner selection based on agility compatibility, establishing enablers (organizational culture, information systems, process flexibility), embedding process control for responsiveness, and nurturing strategic partnerships supported by postponement and dynamic capabilities. The framework also accommodates lean‑agile hybrids (leagile) to balance cost‑efficiency with responsiveness, and includes digital transformation influences such as IoT/AI-driven warehouse management.
Implications: For practitioners, the framework offers a diagnostic and design tool to assess and build supply chain agility holistically. For academics, it provides a foundation for empirical validation and extension in different industry contexts.
Originality: By unifying disparate streams into an integrated conceptual architecture, this paper addresses a significant literature gap and advances theory by illustrating the interactions among critical agility determinants.
References
Matawale, C. R., Datta, S., & Mahapatra, S. S. (2016). Supplier/partner selection in agile supply chain: Application of vague set as a decision‑making tool. Benchmarking: An International Journal (BIJ), 23(4), 866-892. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-03-2014-0020
Navid, B. J., & Ismaeli, S. (2012). Analyzing effective elements in agile supply chain. Management Science Letters, 2(1), 369-378. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2011.07.008
Pandey, V. C., & Garg, S. (2009). Analysis of interaction among the enablers of agility in the supply chain. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 6(1), 99-114. https://doi.org/10.1108/09727980910972190
Pearson, M., Masson, P., & Swain, A. (2010). Process control in an agile supply network. International Journal of Production Economics, 128(1), 22-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.01.027
Power, D. J., Sohal, A. S., & Rahman, S. U. (2001). Critical success factors in agile supply chain management – An empirical study. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 31(4), 247-265. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030110394923
Qrunfleh, S., & Tarafdar, M. (2013). Lean and agile supply chain strategies and supply chain responsiveness: The role of strategic supply chain partnership and postponement. Supply Chain Management, 18(6), 571-582. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-01-2013-0015
Rahiminezhad Galankashi, M., & Helmi, S. A. (2016). Assessment of hybrid lean-agile (leagile) supply chain strategies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 27(4), 470-482. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-08-2015-0069
Sangari, M. S., & Razmi, J. (2015). Business intelligence competence, agile capabilities, and agile performance in supply chain: An empirical study. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 26(2), 356–380. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-01-2013-0012
Sangari, M. S., Razmi, J., & Zolfaghari, S. (2015). Developing a practical evaluation framework for identifying critical factors to achieve supply chain agility. Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation, 62, 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2014.11.002
Shashi, Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., & Ertz, M. (2020). Agile supply chain management: Where did it come from and where will it go in the era of digital transformation? Industrial Marketing Management, 90, 324-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.07.011
Chowdhury, W. A. (2025). Agile, IoT, and AI: Revolutionizing Warehouse Tracking and Inventory Management in Supply Chain Operations. Journal of Procurement and Supply Chain Management, 4(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.58425/jpscm.v4i1.349
Meiliana, Daniella, G., Wijaya, N., Putra, N. G. E., & Efata, R. (2023). Agile Software Development Effort Estimation based on Product Backlog Items. Procedia Computer Science, 227, 186–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.10.516
Michalides, M., Bursac, N., Nicklas, S. J., Weiss, S., & Paetzold, K. (2023). Analyzing current Challenges on Scaled Agile Development of Physical Products. Procedia CIRP, 119, 1188–1197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.02.188
Mishra, A., & Alzoubi, Y. I. (2023). Structured software development versus agile software development: a comparative analysis. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-023-01958-5
Narayanan, S., & Antoniou, C. (2022). Electric cargo cycles – A comprehensive review. Transport Policy, 116, 278–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.12.011
Njoya, E. T., Forsyth, P., Niemeier, H.-M., & Nikitas, A. (2023). Examining the impact of air cargo growth on poor Vietnamese rural and urban households. Transport Economics and Management, 1, 112–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.team.2023.08.001
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ananya Rao

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Individual articles are published Open Access under the Creative Commons Licence: CC-BY 4.0.